Rationalizing Invasion – Occupation and Servitude

Creating The Conditions – Not Just for Occupation – But Ownership and Societal Erasure

When I think about the actions of the United States of America, and how they are alienating the entire world including their former allies, friends and neighbours, it strikes me that unless those behind the actions of this administration must have a more rational long-term plan than the short-term goals presented in Project 2025.

Why would a nation that is the sole superpower be willing to drive away all of its former allies, unless there was an ulterior motive, and if so, what might that be?

Only one response makes sense, and it is a long term possibility.

To invade Canada.

But the question is why?

America already sees/saw 76% of Canadian exports flow to the United States, so what would be the value in alienating a nation that it would eventually need the collaboration of in the future?

The answer is as irrational as it is dangerous.

Survival is not essential.

Erroneous Assumptions

First, we all assume that nations are ‘rational actors’. The United States would never do something that seemed entirely irrational would it? But what if the core of that nation’s supporters, in this case MAGA Republicans, and more importantly the cadre of those plutocrats and kleptocrats supporting Trump decided that the ‘zero-sum game’ was worth war, dislocation, and the creation of enemies?

What if the plan was to become a fascist country, and the world was simply missing the obvious?

The United States may have absolutely no interest in having allies. It may simply feel that if it possesses all of the necessary means for self-sufficiency in the future, the long future; then the need for allies, partners and friends is, if not irrelevant, unnecessary.

Climate Change, Anthropogenesis and America

The decision by the United States to ignore climate change and its long-term effects may have more to do with America’s plans for the future than it does what a climatologist of rational earth sciences professional may well assume would be logical, pragmatic and reasonable.

What if the assumption is that the earth, in its present state, is beyond saving in its present form?

What if the assumption was that climate change was so advanced that reengineering of the earth climate was beyond the capacity of man to effect?

Assume that the world’s climate will increase by between 3-5 degrees Celsius in the next fifty to 75 years? What will the world look like?

Now, assume that you are the only superpower in existence, and that in order to survive the impending changes, you need to ensure several things, and, what might they be?

What is At Risk? What is the Likelihood (Frequency), Probability and Severity of the Risk?

I’m a former emergency planning director, Fire Chief and Director of Emergency Services having had the responsibility for mitigating and managing risk for four different communities in Canada in three provinces. There were, and are the obvious ‘terms of risk’ in relation to time. What will happen over the next five year planning cycle? What about the medium term of five to fifteen years, and what of the long-term?

In relation to a ‘community’ of interests, it is not all that difficult to list the known and rational risks, and to them gather data, analyze that data, prioritize those risks on the basis of frequency of an event, the probability of its occurrence and of course, the impacts or severity should it occur.

But one looks at a national, global perspective, the complexity doesn’t simply allow for all of the factors to be accurately gathered, analyzed, and then prioritized, mitigated or somehow avoided entirely. There are too many factors that could possibly impact a decision. Many of which are beyond the control of a local jurisdiction, or even a national capacity to manage effectively.

And the greatest of all of these challenges is now what faces the entirety of the human race.

Needs

Obviously, any viable society requires some essentials, that at the present moment may not be entirely within that societies ownership. What of the basics?

Water?

Food?

Strategic Resources?

Energy?

A sufficient population?

Capacity of either sustainability or growth?

Now consider what the future holds for your nation in its present form.

Think of the United States of America?

Will isolation in its present form serve its purposes?

Likely not.

But what if the plan is not to envision a future that is as it currently exists? What if the plan is to create a new ‘nation’ if you will, one that is hegemonic by design and sees the management of not just a hemisphere but its contiguous whole, North and South?

What If the United States of America’s Intention is For it to be constituent of North America, Central America and South America?

If one envisions the creation of a new nation of nations, where control is maintained by the force of arms and where independence of action is planned, — not utilizing collaboration, cooperation or even competition, but simply complete conquest and ownership? Is that possible hemispherically in what might be called the New World?

Now what if a nation was so evil in its intent, and so overtly powerful that it did not care if conquest required massive casualties, if the ‘others’ were so immaterial to those in power that survival for the ‘others’ was, less than important. What if in the future, machines and not men were to be responsible for servicing man. Food production, manufacturing, resource extraction, even the projection of military force?

What if the goal of the intended hegemony was not just conquest, but the near annihilation of the ‘others’? What if their labour was only relevant if their resource requirements were minimized?

The total population of North America, Central America, the Caribbean nations and South America, account for 20.7% of the entire world’s population of 7.9 billion people, yet its resources are disproportionate to its population.

With only one fifth of the world’s resource demands, if sustainability were the intention, which of course with a fascist hegemony in control would never be the case, there may well be enough resources to ensure that if this new hemispheric hegemony were actually to exist, they would have both isolation from the remainder of the world, and the ability to sustain the demands listed above of food, water, resources, energy and strategic requirements.

But how would such a state be created in a peaceful, respectful manner?

It wouldn’t.

And so, here is the ‘rub’.

Conquest – War – Subjugation or Annihilation

Today it seems an impossibility to conceive of a nation whose aims are inconsistent with the survival of other nations and their populations. But has history not taught us anything? Is America any further removed from committing mass murder or having the willingness to subjugate and destroy others, if their future were to be secured, if not guaranteed?

Why is America any different than Rome or Nazi Germany?

The aims of Rome and Nazi Germany were global conquest. The only difference was in relation to what was ‘the known world’ in relation to Rome, and the fact that Germany was part of a contiguous land mass where both population, resistance and technology enabled control and their defeat or collapse.

But what if via the threat of invasion, step-by-step and through economic destruction or finally the use of tactical nuclear weapons, one super power were able to subjugate all of the other nations, who themselves have no ability to retaliate?

Is this scenario, over decades, not possible?

Is the United States incapable of such behaviour? Does it have the integrity, the honourable behaviour of a nations so steeped in ethics and morality that such action is inconceivable?

I think not.

America since Koreas has been responsible for the mass murder of millions of innocents, in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and in the future?

America is More Than Capable of Mass Murder in Order to Create Hemispheric Dominance

America is the only nation to have employed nuclear weapons. America has willfully and with malice, murdered millions over the last 65 years, (an estimated 2-3 million in the Vietnam War, 630,000 in the Iraq Wars, and 650,000 because of the Iraq Invasion by the U.S., that created the power vacuum that enabled the creation of Al Queda and ISIS. In addition U.S. actions caused the refugee crises where 6.7 million Syrians fled Syria, destabilizing Turkey, and the EU. And the United States, through these and its Islamaphobic actions in Gaza, is responsible for the deaths of another 72,000 Palestinians to date, all at the hand of American munitions rained from the air. Enough that for every Palestinian man, woman and child, in Gaza, America provided Israel with approximately 23 pounds of explosives ‘to kill them’.

United States actions, have accomplished all of this ‘mass murder’ in a mere tic of the clock geologically, yet America somehow sees itself as the protector of freedom and democracy as well as the supreme power in the world.

America, has been, and continues to be a human pathogen, indiscriminately killing millions and millions or people.

And for the most part, all of this occurred under leaders that were infinitely more moral, more ethical, honest and empathy than the lunatic and sociopath that now rules the United States like Caligula did Rome.

And it isn’t just humanity that America is intent on destroying.

America now has a leadership that has no morality, no ethics and no concern for the environment or other species on this planet. It is only concerned with its own foreseeable future, as irrational or asinine that action may be.

And yet, Americans are so myopic, so narrow-minded, that they will ignore this in order to preserve their own finances.

To America — the world doesn’t matter.

But Finite Means that Americans Will Expire With the Rest of Us

The planet is finite.

We don’t have four more to provide the necessary resources to sustain America’s current rates of consumption.

Man, is the antithesis of intelligent. He is a parasite. And capitalism is his instrument of choice.The .01% of the world’s people who essentially rule it, only care for themselves. Capitalism, globalization, greed and unlimited hubris and arrogance has led us to what will be, the destruction of this planet.

The richest and the most powerful of nations and its plutocrats, through their anthropogenic actions, illustrate no interest in ‘sharing’ this planet with those who are less powerful, less fortunate, less educated and are therefore less likely to survive the impending destruction of the earth’s environment, ecosystems or planetary control systems that sustain life.

And of all the nations of this world, America is the most self-interested, myopic and willing to destroy it for its own short-term interests.

Sustainability is eschewed, as is logic, rationality, reason or the taking of intelligent actions.

Their actions, our reality, is that the ‘gains’, the zero-sum greed, the exercise of power through military force, arrogance, stupidity and indifference is such that this planet is essentially doomed.

Optimism is nothing more than complete ignorance on their part.

And because of it, man is no longer worth saving.